
The Bishop's Guildhall in Salisbury was
probably built in the early fourteenth century. Here we see
its demolition in 1795 (because ruinous); the current guildhall
stands on the same site.
Extract from a watercolour in the Salisbury Museum,
artist unknown
The administration of justice at New Salisbury was in the hands of the
Bishop, and consequently it was his court that convened in a guildhall in
the south-east corner of the marketplace; he also later had a prison there.
His seigneurial powers were exercised by his bailiff. Local self-government
was probably spearheaded by the merchant guild, but a mayor was being elected
by the early part of Henry III's reign. The bishop conceded a power-sharing
state of affairs, through an agreement with the citizens in 1306, giving
official recognition to guild and mayor; the bishop retained sole
jurisdiction over judicial administration, but the presence of the mayor
was required for judgements to be passed.
The communal administration
had control over market, trade and other commercial matters, maintenance of
the fabric of the town, and taxation. A group of 4 ward aldermen
assisted the mayor, but governmental assemblies appear to have been open to
all citizens. A council of 24 is seen by the close of the fourteenth
century and was supplemented by a second of 48 representatives ca.1445;
the two councils constituted the effective assembly. Although not until
the sixteenth century do we hear complaints that others were shut out
of meetings, attendance at most meetings rarely exceeded the councillors
and city officials.
The meeting place of the communal assembly possibly varied during the
fourteenth century; St. Thomas' church may have been one location, for
the common chest was housed there in 1414. In 1416 we first hear of the
Council House near that church. However, the Bishop's Guildhall and city
churches were also used in following years for assemblies expected to draw
larger attendance; St. Edmund's was usually the location for electoral
assemblies. The Council House was used for more routine meetings of
the administration, as well as for housing the archives and treasury, and
presumably related bureaucracy.

The 'old town hall' in Northampton's marketplace.
The external staircase and the style of the windows are suggestive of a
medieval date. The building was one of the few to survive the devastating
fire of 1675, with the exception of the staircase, but was pulled down
in 1864 after a new town hall had been built.
Northampton's guildhall was large enough to accommodate the weekly meetings
of the portmoot (or husting court, as the royal charters had it, modelling
Northampton's liberties after London's) and of the town council, but
popular assemblies for purposes of elections or the promulgation of
important legislation were by 1300 summoned to meet in the larger space
of either St. Giles' churchyard or the church interior. The guildhall in
its earliest form probably comprised a two-storey structure, with the hall
on the upper floor and the ground floor originally an open area, where
stalls could be erected under shelter. Helen Cam [Victoria County History
of Northamptonshire, (1930), vol.3, p.36] has suggested the third storey
may have been added in the 15th century when assembly meetings began to be
held there in the 1490s.
In 1467 efforts were made at Leicester to control unruly behaviour
at communal assemblies, by banning non-freemen from such meetings and
prohibiting those who were permitted to attend from yelling out nominations
at elections [see Rules for orderly procedure at elections]. This
did not resolve the problem, however. In 1489 parliamentary acts
instituted both there and at Northampton a representative lower council
of 48 burgesses to substitute for the assembly in the role of approving
legislation and electing officers. The act for Northampton refers to
disputes over elections, noting that
The town council subsequently set out how elections would be conducted,
henceforth in the privacy of the Guildhall, able to contain the reduced
electorate, in an orderly fashion with as little noise as possible
(votes being tallied in writing, rather than through acclaim or physical
indications). In the 1490s this was followed by legislation setting
punishments for seditious or slanderous talk against the administration,
and for disobedience to mayoral orders.
print window |
close window