The Men Behind the Masque:
Office-holding in East Anglian boroughs, 1272-1460
[contents]
CHAPTER 4
Attitudes Towards Office-holding
Notes
1 Although this is not to say that some men (not merely the
town clerk) did not pursue careers in professional administration;
see chapter 5.
2 As have A. White, Self-Government at the King's
Command: a Study in the Beginnings of English Democracy, (Minneapolis,
1933), 128; Saul, op.cit., 44; Reynolds, op.cit., 121.
3 Saul, op.cit., 91.
4 I thank the King's Lynn archivist for the opportunity
to study this document a few days after its discovery, at which time
it had not been catalogued; I refer to it here as KL/Roll of wages.
Damage to the top of m.1 and loss of m.2 make it difficult to determine
the exact nature of the document. Two-thirds of the persons listed
are among the men falling within the scope of this study.
5 Red Reg. f.160b. In 1378, in the context of paring of
the budget, the corporation ordained that tax-collectors would
henceforth have to operate at their own expense.
6 And also officers of the staple, not mentioned in the
roll; C67/23 m.6r.
7 Red Parch. Bk., 32, 39, 194; Strutt, op.cit.,
xi. Each bailiff was also provided with a livery worth 20s.
8 Black Domesday ff.74-75; I/C1/3/1/1 ff.4-5; Gross,
op.cit., II, 122; Gomme, op.cit., 34-35.
9 Records of Norwich, II, 44; Swinden, op.cit.,
494; D/B 3/3/68.
10 KL/C39 passim; KL/C37/2; Parkin, op.cit.,
Add.Ms. 37791 f.45. Parkin may be correct in suggesting that the
1271 payment to the mayor was only an instalment of a full £10 annual
salary.
11 KL/C37/5 m.1r; Martin, Borough and Merchant Community
of Ipswich, 82; Black Domesday f.74.
12 Add.Ms. 30158 f.25.
13 Swinden, op.cit., 494; Red Parch. Bk., 43;
Add.Ms. 37791 ff.45, 48b; KL/C39 passim.
14 Palmer, Continuation of Manship's History, 194;
D/B 3/1/1 f.4b; McKisack, Parliamentary Representation of English
Boroughs, 82, 87, 89-90; McKisack, "Parliamentary representation
of King's Lynn," 588; KL/C39 passim.
15 McKisack, Parliamentary Representation of English
Boroughs, 90; Roskell, op.cit., 141; Muir, op.cit.,
143; General Court Roll 12-14 Ed.IV m.2r; Add.Ms. 30158 ff.24, 25, 28b;
Dogget Roll 6-7 Ed.IV m.4d.
16 Dobson, York City Chamberlains' Account Rolls, xxxii.
17 KL/C39/39 m.3d; KL/C7/2 f.152b; McKisack, Parliamentary
Representation of English Boroughs, 88, 90, 91, 97; Wedgwood,
History of Parliament: Register, cxxv.
18 Saul, op.cit., 57.
19 Ibid., 82, 92, 106-07.
20 C.F.R. 1337-47, 352; Col.C.R., II, 47; Red Paper Bk.,
11; Gras, op.cit., 97.
21 Martin, Borough and Merchant Community of Ipswich,
73; Saul, op.cit., 25, 37, 92; C1/28/512. We shall
investigate corruption more closely in chapter 6.
22 Twiss, op.cit., 167.
23 One has only to see the quantity of Ipswich rolls, the
bulk of the Yarmouth rolls, and the drastic increase in size (both
in number of membranes and size of membranes) in the later fourteenth
century Colchester rolls, to appreciate that the business of the
principal sessions was not to be dispensed with quickly.
24 Col.C.R./34 m.21d.
25 However, it was more probably to cope with illnesses
or other causes of absenteeism. There is no systematic division of
labour evident in the records. Judging from Ipswich recognisances,
it was common for both bailiffs to be present on even these relatively
informal occasions (there being no good reason not to take witness
lists at face value). At Yarmouth it may be that certain of the
bailiffs did more work than others, but this appears to have been a
matter of chance; Saul, op.cit., 24.
26 Swinden, op.cit., 494.
27 Saul, op.cit., 34; Glover, op.cit., 165;
KL/C7/4 f.110
28 Red Reg. f.125.
29 Alsford, Urban Administration in Medieval Norwich,
75; Saul, op.cit., 63, 138; C.F.R. 1347-56, 300;
C.P.R. 1338-40, 133, 1370-74, 355; Red Paper Bk., 7. Yarmouth
ex-bailiff Ralph Ramsey was, in 1405, pardoned £160 arrears from his
account at the Exchequer as sheriff of Norfolk; C.P.R. 1401-05, 483.
30 Swinden, op.cit., 494; D/B/ 3/1/1 f.22;
D/B/ 3/1/2 f.22; D/B 3/3/14 m.1r; Add.Ms. 30158 f.8.
31 Col.C.R./28 m.12r, /37 m.34d; P.P.R. 20-21 Ric.II,
mm.3d, 6d.
32 E.g. see KL/C39/35, 37; Glover, op.cit., 81.
33 Martin, Borough and Merchant Community of Ipswich,
134; D/B 3/1/2 f.6b; Col.C.R., I, 202.
34 Martin, Borough and Merchant Community of Ipswich,
142, 189; Red Reg. f.155; Saul, op.cit., 47.
35 C. Palmer, ed., A Booke of the Foundacion and Antiquity
of the Towne of Greate Yermouthe, (Great Yarmouth, 1847), 106;
Rot.Parl., II, 37.
36 C.Ch.R. 1257-1300, 185-86; Swinden, op.cit., 497.
37 Records of Norwich, I, 191-92, 286.
38 Red Paper Bk., 16, 159.
39 Dogget Roll 17-38 Hen.VI m.4r; White Domesday f.14.
40 D/B 3/1/1 ff.4b, 31b; D/B 3/1/2 ff.2, 12b;
D/B 3/1/3 ff.21b-24; D/B 3/3/4 m.6r, /21 m.1r.
41 Richards, op.cit., 425, 463; KL/C37/3 f.99;
Add.Ms. 37791 f.48b.
42 Add.Ms. 37791 f.50; Red Reg. ff.153b, 166;
KL/C7/2 f.56; KL/C9/1 f.15b; KL/C7/3 f.273b; KL/C39/28 m.1r, /30
schedule.
43 Reynolds, op.cit., 180-81; Dobson, "Urban
decline in late medieval England," 13; McKisack, Parliamentary
Representation of English Boroughs, 27. At a higher level of
society knighthood was unpopular because of the responsibilities it
incurred (the efforts of Ipswich's Richard Leu to avoid it have
already been mentioned); Denholm-Young, op.cit., 22.
44 KL/C5/1 m.3r; KL/C7/2 f.51; KL/C7/3 f.212;
KL/C6/6 m.18d.
45 KL/C2/29; KL/C7/4 ff.28b, 41b; KL/C7/3 ff.78b, 101b, 106.
46 KL/C7/3 ff.5-6, 15; KL/C7/2 f.84.
47 W. Jones, "Rex et ministri: English local government
and the crisis of 1341," Journal of British Studies, XIII (1973),
no.1, 19; KL/C7/3 f.199b.
48 C.Ch.R. 1427-1516, 152, 197; Bacon, op.cit., 123.
49 Rose, op.cit., 126-27; Muir, op.cit.,
115, 146; Lawson, op.cit., 268-69.
50 C.P.R. 1381-85, 214, 1385-89, 505, 508, 1391-96, 187,
379, 1401-05, 355, 1405-08, 376, 1408-13, 199; Rose, op.cit.,
167. Colchester already had a wall, since Roman times, but doubtless
what was meant was repairs and rebuilding rather than construction.
51 C.P.R. passim.
52 E122/50/1; Cal.Memo.Rolls 1326-27, 235.
53 E101/457/19; E122/158/15; C.P.R. 1345-48, 220.
54 Braunch was M.P. in September, and obtained his exemption
in October, 1353; Gunton was last mayor in 1364/5 and obtained his
exemption in May 1366.
55 Lawson, op.cit., 128, suggests that Toppes'
temporary retirement from public life was prompted by the threats of
his political enemies.
56 Records of Norwich, II, 66, 220.
57 KL/C7/3 ff.41b, 140, 242b, 279b.
58 Add.Ms. 30158 ff.30b, 33b.
59 C.Cl.R. 1302-07, 246; C.F.R. 1327-37, 48.
60 KL/C7/4 ff.92b, 165; Red Reg. f.158b.
61 Rogers, op.cit., 37, felt this was the case at
Stamford, where the material benefits of office were not, he considered,
substantial.
62 KL/C2/29; Records of Norwich, I, 95.
63 KL/C6/4 m.10r; KL/C7/2 f.157.
64 Cozens-Hardy and Kent, op.cit., 20; Add.Ms.
37791 f.48b.
65 Col.C.R./12 m.17r.
66 Col.C.R., II, 123.
67 KL/C7/2 ff.48, 51.
68 Black Domesday ff.71-74.
69 E.g. see Saul, op.cit., 58-59.
70 C.P.R. 1370-74, 38, 1377-81, 403, 444.
71 McKisack, Parliamentary Representation of English
Boroughs, 108, 114; Wedgwood, History of Parliament:
Biographies, 856-57; R.R. 12-13 Ed.III m.2r, 25-33 Ed.III m.11d;
N.C.C. Heydon f.44. One member of the Timperley family settled in
Ipswich and was thrice bailiff in the reign of Henry VII.
72 Wedgwood, History of Parliament: Biographies,
252-53; Palmer, Continuation of Manship's History, 195; C.F.R. 1461-71, 95.
73 Add.Ms. 30158 f.16; McKisack, Parliamentary
Representation of English Boroughs, 113-14; Morey, op.cit.,
334-37. Winter may have been a member of a prominent Norfolk gentry
family.
74 Red Parch. Bk., 32; Red Paper Bk., 8, 11, 16.
75 D/B 3/1/2 f.23b.
76 I/C9/10/1; White Domesday f.18b. It is significant
that this ordinance was made at the same time as that prohibiting
bailiffs from retailing wine, ale, or victuals, during their terms of
office.
77 KL/C39/23; Records of Norwich, I, 102, 109-12.
78 Thrupp, "Social control in the medieval town," 49;
Meech and Allen, op.cit., 9. C. Phythian-Adams, "Ceremony and
the citizen: the communal year at Coventry 1450-1550," Crisis and Order
in English Towns 1500-1700, (Toronto, 1972), 60, suggests that
"the exaggerated social precedence of ceremonial occasions was an
office-holder's basic reward."
79 J. Foxe, Acts and Monuments of Matters ... Happening
in the Church, (London, 1641), I, 560; KL/C7/3 ff.217b, 229b.
One might wonder what effect the former event had on Despenser's
attitude towards the peasant rebels in 1381.
80 D/B 3/1/2 f.9b; Records of Norwich, I, 34.
81 Dobson, "Urban decline in late medieval England," 7.
82 KL/C6/4 m.22r.